Awareness Level and Barriers to the Use of Quantity Surveying Software in the Nigerian Built Environment
Abstract
Despite the versatility of the quantity surveying profession, the literature evidence indicates that most quantity surveyors do not venture into non-traditional roles because they are saddled with the time-consuming tasks of manual and clerical tasks, due to the limited use of software. Traditional schools of thought thus dominate Quantity Surveying professional practice in Nigeria. This study examines the level of awareness of the relevance of technology to the Nigerian quantity surveying profession, the level of adoption and use of technology, and the barriers affecting the use of technology. Using the survey research strategy, structured questionnaires were distributed to quantity surveyors in Rivers State, Nigeria. The study findings show that quantity surveyors in Rivers State are aware of some software and technologies used in the quantity surveying profession and that they have adopted some form of technology in providing quantity surveying services. The findings however indicate that the cost of engaging computer literate staff, training on the use of technologies, high cost of hardware and software, obsolescence, data security risks, and low job order are the primary factors that hindered the use and adoption of technology on quantity surveying profession in Rivers State. Surmounting these barriers would require decisive and dedicated actions, to achieve the time savings and enhanced efficiency afforded by information technology use. Quantity surveyors should strive to possess and exhibit the desirable knowledge and range of skills, necessary to remain relevant in the information-intensive and technologically driven built environment landscape.
References
Davis FD. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS quarterly. 1989 Sep 1:319–40.
Akunyumu S, Fugar FD, Adinyira E, Danku JC. A review of models for assessing the readiness of construction organisations to innovate. Construction Innovation. 2021 Mar 18;21(2):279–99.
Ajam, M., Alshawi, M and Mezher, T. (2010). Augmented process model for e-tendering: towards integrating object models with document management systems. Automation in Construction 19 (6), 762–778. the Importance of Trust and Social Influence.
Tornatzky, L.G., Klein, K.J. (1982). Tornatzky_Klein_1982 Innovation Characteristics and Innovation Adoption-Implementation A Meta-Analysis of Findings. IEEE Transactions of Engineering and Management.
Smithson, J. (2000). Using and analysing focus groups: Limitations and possibilities. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 3,103–119.
Whyte, J. (2019). How Digital Information Transforms Project Delivery Models. Project Management Journal, Vol. 50 No. 2, pp. 177–194. DOI: 10.1177/8756972818823304
Akunyumu, S., Fugar, F.D.K., Adinyira, E. (2020). A review of models for assessing the readiness of construction organisations to innovate.https://doi.org/10.1108/CI-01-2020-0014
Bloor, M., Frankland, J., Thomas, M., Robson, K. (2001). Focus groups in social research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications Inc.
Chen, L., Aklikokou, A.K. (2020). Determinants of E-government Adoption: Testing theMediating Effects of Perceived Usefulness and Perceived Ease of Use. Int. J. Public Adm.43, 850–865. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2019.1660989
Cornwall, A., Jewkes, R. (1995). What is participatory research? SocialScience and Medicine, 14, 1667–1676.
Davis, F.D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. Delle vicendedell’ agricoltura Ital. Stud. e note di C. Bertagnolli.13, 319–340. https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.33621
Dewar, R.D., Dutton, J.E. (1986). The Adoption of Radical and Incremental Innovations: AnEmpirical Analysis. Manage. Sci. 32, 1422–1433. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.32.11.1422
Fishbein M, Ajzen I. Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research.
Fogarty, G., Rose, J. (2000). Determinants of perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use in the technology acceptance model: senior consumers’ adoption of self-service banking technologies. Acad. World Business, Marketing, and Management Dev. Conf. Proc. 122–129.
Froese, T.M. (2010). The impact of emerging information technology on project management for construction, Automation in Construction. Vol. 19 (2010) pp. 531–538.
Ibem, O. E and Laryea, S. (2014). Survey of digital technologies in the procurement of construction projects. Automation in Construction 46 (2014) 11–21.
Ifinedo, P. (2011). An empirical analysis of factors influencing internet/e-business technologies adoption by SMEs in Canada. Int. J. Inf. Technol. Decis. Mak. 10, 731–766. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219622011004543
Jaradat, S., Whyte, J, and Luck, R. (2013). Professionalism in digitally mediated project work. Building Research & Information, Vol 41 No.1, pp 51–59.
Johnson, A. (1996). ‘It is good to talk’: The focus group and the sociological imagination. The Sociological Review, 44, 517–538.
Katebi, A., Homami, P., Najmeddin, M. (2022). Acceptance model of precast concrete components in building construction based on the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) and technology, Organization, and Environment (TOE) framework ☆ 45.
Kitzinger, J. (1994). The methodology of Focus Groups: The importance of interaction between research participants. Sociology of Health and Illness, 16, 103–121.
Kleijnen, M., Wetzels, M., de Ruyter, K. (2004). Consumer acceptance of wireless finance. Journal of. Finance and Service Marketing 8, 206–217. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.fsm.4770120
Lee, S., Yu, J., Jeong, D. (2015). BIM Acceptance Model in Construction Organizations. Journal of Management in. Engineering. 31, 04014048. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)me.1943-5479.0000252
Lobo, S., and Whyte, J. (2017). Aligning and reconciling: Building project capabilities for digital delivery. Research Policy, Vol. 46 No.1, pp. 93–107
McKinsey. (2014). Rethinking infrastructure: Voices from the global infrastructure initiative. New York, NY: McKinsey and Company.
Nyumba, T.O., Wilson, K., Derrick, C.J and Mukherjee, N. (2018). The use of focus group discussion methodology: Insights from two decades of application in conservation. Methods in Ecology and Evolution2018;9:20–32.
Rodríguez-Garzón, I., Lucas-Ruiz, V., Martínez-Fiestas, M., Delgado-Padial, A. (2015). Association between Perceived Risk and Training in the Construction Industry. J. Constr. Eng. Manag. 141, 04014095. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)co.1943-7862.0000960
Agarwal, R., Prasad, J. (1998). A Conceptual and Operational Definition of personal innovativeness in the Domain of Information Technology. Inf. Syst. Res. 9, 204–215. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.9.2.204
